Workflow automation · API / SDK

Kestra API

Kestra

Access workflow orchestration through documented API resources.

Official documentationDownload development spec

KESTRA / DEVELOPER FIELD GUIDE

Choose an interface. Define a verifiable result.

Company or project context, ten technical entry points and a practical analysis of every reference.

2026-10-08 · Integration not tested

Company / project overview

Original summary of official company or project statements; use the source for the full original page.

Kestra · About
Company and projectKestra develops a declarative orchestration platform for data pipelines, infrastructure, applications and AI workflows.
Engineering focusIts About page emphasizes quality, collaboration, user feedback and transparency.
Edition choiceThe API reference distinguishes open-source and Enterprise editions; match deployment capabilities before implementation.
Complete official About page ↗
About reference — TA analysis
AudienceBuyers, partners and product owners shortlisting an AI provider.
Our assessmentUse positioning and company history for initial fit. Obtain project-specific deployment, support and commercial terms separately.

Official sources reviewed; no live API, inference or benchmark was run. Expected results are proposed internal contracts.

Top 10 technical entry points

Ten documented technical entry points selected by developer task; not ten separate SDKs or an official ranking.

Choose by the work you need to complete
InterfacePurpose and audience
01 · Flow definitionAPI / SDK / developer guideDefine an orchestration unit and its tasks.Workflow authors
02 · ExecutionsAPI / SDK / developer guideStart and observe individual flow runs.Orchestration integrators
03 · Workflow inputsAPI / SDK / developer guideDeclare and validate flow parameters.Contract designers
04 · Workflow outputsAPI / SDK / developer guidePass results between tasks and expose flow outputs.Pipeline developers
05 · Webhook triggerAPI / SDK / developer guideInitiate flows through HTTP-triggered events.Event integration teams
06 · Error handlingAPI / SDK / developer guideDefine failure handling within workflows.Reliability owners
07 · Task retriesAPI / SDK / developer guideRetry transient failures with declared policies.Integration engineers
08 · Task timeoutAPI / SDK / developer guideLimit task run duration.Operations teams
09 · Flow concurrencyAPI / SDK / developer guideLimit simultaneous executions.Capacity planners
10 · Task plugin developmentAPI / SDK / developer guideImplement custom task behavior.Plugin developers

Reference analysis

Capabilities summarize official documentation. Constraints and proposed tests are our engineering assessment.

01

API / SDK / developer guide

Flow definition

Flow definition · TA
Target audienceWorkflow authors
Documented capabilityDefine an orchestration unit and its tasks.
Input → outputFlow definition → versioned executable workflow.
Execution environmentPinned Kestra server, plugins and configured task runner
Our decision constraintValid syntax does not prove referenced plugins or services work.
Our suggested validationValidate definition and resolve every task dependency.
Official reference · Flow definition ↗
02

API / SDK / developer guide

Executions

Executions · TA
Target audienceOrchestration integrators
Documented capabilityStart and observe individual flow runs.
Input → outputFlow and inputs → execution ID and lifecycle state.
Execution environmentPinned Kestra server, plugins and configured task runner
Our decision constraintCreated execution is not terminal success.
Our suggested validationCorrelate task states with the execution terminal outcome.
Official reference · Executions ↗
03

API / SDK / developer guide

Workflow inputs

Workflow inputs · TA
Target audienceContract designers
Documented capabilityDeclare and validate flow parameters.
Input → outputProvided values → typed workflow inputs.
Execution environmentPinned Kestra server, plugins and configured task runner
Our decision constraintMissing required values and wrong types must not become silent defaults.
Our suggested validationTest absent, malformed and boundary input values.
Official reference · Workflow inputs ↗
04

API / SDK / developer guide

Workflow outputs

Workflow outputs · TA
Target audiencePipeline developers
Documented capabilityPass results between tasks and expose flow outputs.
Input → outputTask results → referenced output values.
Execution environmentPinned Kestra server, plugins and configured task runner
Our decision constraintA task may fail before producing an output.
Our suggested validationVerify missing output handling and type consistency.
Official reference · Workflow outputs ↗
05

API / SDK / developer guide

Webhook trigger

Webhook trigger · TA
Target audienceEvent integration teams
Documented capabilityInitiate flows through HTTP-triggered events.
Input → outputAuthorized webhook event → execution.
Execution environmentPinned Kestra server, plugins and configured task runner
Our decision constraintRetries from an event sender can create duplicate business actions.
Our suggested validationDefine deduplication keys and validate duplicate-event behavior.
Official reference · Webhook trigger ↗
06

API / SDK / developer guide

Error handling

Error handling · TA
Target audienceReliability owners
Documented capabilityDefine failure handling within workflows.
Input → outputTask failure → configured error path.
Execution environmentPinned Kestra server, plugins and configured task runner
Our decision constraintSuccessful cleanup is not proof the original work succeeded.
Our suggested validationInject a failure and preserve the original failed outcome.
Official reference · Error handling ↗
07

API / SDK / developer guide

Task retries

Task retries · TA
Target audienceIntegration engineers
Documented capabilityRetry transient failures with declared policies.
Input → outputFailed attempt → bounded subsequent attempt.
Execution environmentPinned Kestra server, plugins and configured task runner
Our decision constraintSide effects require idempotency or reconciliation.
Our suggested validationVerify attempt limits and no duplicate external mutation.
Official reference · Task retries ↗
08

API / SDK / developer guide

Task timeout

Task timeout · TA
Target audienceOperations teams
Documented capabilityLimit task run duration.
Input → outputOverrunning task → configured timeout behavior.
Execution environmentPinned Kestra server, plugins and configured task runner
Our decision constraintTiming out orchestration may not reverse external side effects.
Our suggested validationCheck cancellation behavior and reconcile downstream state.
Official reference · Task timeout ↗
09

API / SDK / developer guide

Flow concurrency

Flow concurrency · TA
Target audienceCapacity planners
Documented capabilityLimit simultaneous executions.
Input → outputIncoming executions → configured queue/limit handling.
Execution environmentPinned Kestra server, plugins and configured task runner
Our decision constraintConcurrency settings affect wait times and downstream capacity.
Our suggested validationSubmit a bounded burst and verify declared overflow policy.
Official reference · Flow concurrency ↗
10

API / SDK / developer guide

Task plugin development

Task plugin development · TA
Target audiencePlugin developers
Documented capabilityImplement custom task behavior.
Input → outputTask inputs and context → task outputs.
Execution environmentPinned Kestra server, plugins and configured task runner
Our decision constraintPlugin API and server compatibility must be pinned together.
Our suggested validationTest valid input, exception and cancellation behavior.
Official reference · Task plugin development ↗

API reference

API reference · Supporting reference analysis
TAAPI integration teams
Our validation adviceUse the reference matching the selected edition, server version and authentication model.
Official reference · API reference ↗

04 / INPUT · EXPECTED OUTPUT · ACCEPTANCE

Expected results before implementation

Proposed execution receipt; not a native Kestra API response. No workflow, task, webhook or external service was executed.

Illustrative contract · no API call or model execution · not measured provider output

Successful execution

Expected behavior — illustrative, not executed
InputValid inputs and all required tasks finish.
Expected resultok with terminal execution state and declared outputs.
AcceptanceConfirm every required dependency completed and outputs exist.

Empty workload

Expected behavior — illustrative, not executed
InputValid input list contains zero eligible items.
Expected resultok with processed_count: 0 if the flow defines empty work as valid.
AcceptanceDo not create placeholder external actions.

Queued execution

Expected behavior — illustrative, not executed
InputFlow concurrency capacity is occupied.
Expected resultpending/queued under configured policy, not completed.
AcceptanceExpose wait state and enforce agreed maximum wait.

Task fails after retries

Expected behavior — illustrative, not executed
InputTransient failure persists beyond the retry limit.
Expected resulterror with task and execution identifiers; preserve failed state.
AcceptanceVerify retry count and reconcile any prior external side effects.

Map the expected result to your application

Map the actual SDK or service response into this proposed internal contract after integration. All IDs and values below are invented examples; no credentials or live requests are included.

Expected output JSON — illustrative, not measured · KestraAPI-expected-results.json
{
  "schema_version": "1.0.0",
  "example": true,
  "provider": "Kestra",
  "status": "ok",
  "input_id": "sample-001",
  "data": {
    "execution_id": "example-execution",
    "flow_id": "example-flow",
    "flow_revision": 1,
    "execution_state": "SUCCESS",
    "outputs": {
      "processed_count": 3
    }
  },
  "error": null,
  "verification": "illustrative-only;not-provider-response"
}
Download specification, example and acceptance plan
Engineering handoff — our proposed contract and gates
Result interpretationSuccessful transport or execution does not establish model accuracy. Preserve valid empty results separately from operational failure.
ReproducibilityRecord model, runtime, configuration and input identifiers; agree quality and latency criteria before representative tests. No measured performance is claimed.
Operation boundaryProposed execution receipt; not a native Kestra API response. No workflow, task, webhook or external service was executed.

Development assessment

Evidence extraction pipeline

Development concept · integration not tested

Provider capabilities above are based on official documentation or repositories. The proposed product, inputs, deliverable and acceptance criteria below are our development assessment.

Small prototype

Test one documented operation with a small real sample after access is confirmed. This is a development judgment, not a delivery estimate.

Proposed inputs
A sample event, authorized systems and one defined workflow transition.
Proposed deliverable
A visible job state and audit trail for a single workflow.
Acceptance criterion
A retried event must not create duplicate work; an unavailable upstream must remain visibly pending or failed.
Dependencies
Runtime access, workflow permissions and a reviewed notification or write destination.

Development sequence

  1. Confirm access to Kestra API, license and the exact supported version.
  2. Prepare the sample above and implement one documented operation for “Evidence extraction pipeline”.
  3. Normalize the result with source, time and explicit error state; keep the provider response for review.
  4. Run the acceptance criterion before estimating rollout effort or committing a customer deliverable.

How to validate demand

Record product views, documentation clicks, specification downloads and contextual hub clicks. These are event counts, not unique people or completed integrations.

This feasibility assessment uses implementation conditions. No traffic-based rank or delivery-time promise is assigned.

Related products